"There is no evidence for intelligent design, it is pure religion. It should be banned from science classes" Lewis Wolpert

Reported in New Scientist 2nd December. Biologist Lewis Wolpert of University College London on news that 59 secondary schools in the UK are using unsolicited teaching materials sent to them by creationist groups.

The Guardian 27th November

Revealed: rise of creationism in UK schools

PR packs spread controversial theory

James Randerson, science correspondent
Monday November 27, 2006
The Guardian

Dozens of schools are using creationist teaching materials condemned by the government as "not appropriate to support the science curriculum", the Guardian has learned.

The packs promote the creationist alternative to Darwinian evolution called intelligent design and the group behind them said 59 schools are using the information as "a useful classroom resource".

A teacher at one of the schools said it intended to use the DVDs to present intelligent design as an alternative to Darwinism. Nick Cowan, head of chemistry at Bluecoat school, in Liverpool, said: "Just because it takes a negative look at Darwinism doesn't mean it is not science. I think to critique Darwinism is quite appropriate."

But the government has made it clear that "neither intelligent design nor creationism are recognised scientific theories". The chairman of the parliamentary science and technology select committee, the Lib Dem MP Phil Willis, said he was horrified that the packs were being used in schools.

"I am flabbergasted that any head of science would give credence to this creationist theory and be prepared to put it alongside Darwinism," he said. "Treating it as an alternative centralist theory alongside Darwinism in science lessons is deeply worrying."

The teaching pack, which includes two DVDs and a manual, was sent to the head of science at all secondary schools in the country on September 18 by the group Truth in Science. The enclosed feedback postcard was returned by 89 schools. As well as 59 positive responses, 15 were negative or dismissive and 15 said the material was "not suitable".

"We are not attacking the teaching of Darwinian theory," said Richard Buggs, a member of Truth in Science. "We are just saying that criticisms of Darwin's theory should also be taught."

"Intelligent design looks at empirical evidence in the natural world and says, 'this is evidence for a designer'. If you go any further the argument does become religious and intelligent design does have religious implications," added Dr Buggs.

But leading scientists argue that ID is not science because it invokes supernatural causes. "There is just no evidence for intelligent design, it is pure religion and has nothing to do with science. It should be banned from science classes," said Lewis Wolpert, a developmental biologist at the University of London and vice-president of the British Humanist Association.

The DVDs were produced in America and feature figures linked to the Discovery Institute in Seattle, a thinktank that has made concerted efforts to promote ID and insert it into high school science lessons in the US. Last year a judge in Dover, Pennsylvania, ruled that ID could not be taught in science lessons. "Intelligent design is a religious view, a mere relabelling of creationism, and not a scientific theory," he wrote in his judgment.

It is not clear exactly how many schools are using the Truth in Science material, or how it is being used.

The government has made it clear the Truth in Science materials should not be used in science lessons. In a response to the Labour MP Graham Stringer on November 1, Jim Knight, a minister in the Department for Education and Skills, wrote: "Neither intelligent design nor creationism are recognised scientific theories and they are not included in the science curriculum."

Andy McIntosh, a professor of thermodynamics at the University of Leeds who is on the board of Truth in Science, said: "We are just simply a group of people who have put together ... a different case."

Creationism in the UK
21.04.2006: Evolution should be taught as fact, says top scientist
18.04.2006: Star of creationist circuit flies in hoping to stir the faithful
11.04.2006: Science class no place for creationism, says Royal Society
21.03.2006: Archbishop: stop teaching creationism
10.03.2006: Exam board brings creationism into science class
10.03.2006: Exam boards bring creationism into science class
21.02.2006: Academics fight rise of creationism at universities
26.01.2006: Four out of 10 say science classes should include intelligent design

Intelligent design teaching in the US
20.02.2006: Teachers enlisted in battle against creationists
15.02.2006: School board delivers blow to creationism
22.12.2005: Court defeat fails to deter intelligent design backers
21.12.2005: US judge bans intelligent design from science lessons
09.11.2005: Voters oust US school board that backed intelligent design
18.10.2005: Intelligent design opponents invoke US constitution
02.10.2005: On the seventh day, America went to court
27.09.2005: Parents challenge US 'intelligent design' teaching

Comment and analysis
13.01.2006: Designs on Darwin
22.12.2005: Leader: America's evolving confrontation

Q&A
30.09.2005: Intelligent design

Background
26.09.2005: Creation debate that aimed to eradicate classroom bigotry